PDA

View Full Version : Shift-r


Gentlefoot
6th March 2006, 12:14
Something has been really annoying me lately, particularly on demo servers so I thought I'd start this thread in an attempt to educate the offending drivers.

When a 10 lap race is in progress, say 5 laps in maybe, DO NOT vote to restart. Instead, wait for the race to end and then vote restart.

I was on the CRC demo server the other day and it was lap 4 of 5. One guy kept voting to restart. Another guy just behind me in the race asked him to stop. He explained that people were still racing. The response was "so what". I thought this was incredibly rude.

The amount of times I will be nearing the end of the lap, right at the front because others were involved in accidents and it gets restarted. How annoying!

Another time, I joined a race mid way through and on the last lap I was on a flyer. Thought I was about to beat my PB but just as I came through the last complex, the race was restarted and I didn't get my time. I also lost my grid position.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE CAN EVERYONE WAIT UNTIL ALL RACERS HAVE COMPLETED THEIR RACE BEFORE VOTING TO RESTART

tristancliffe
6th March 2006, 12:17
Perhaps this should be in the beginners section. It is annoying.

Cropsy
6th March 2006, 12:20
I find it annoying too, I don't understand why some servers don't let you vote until it has passed 1 minute, this just causes people to constantly vote to restart, flooding with vote/cancel messages. It would make more sense if it wasn't possible to vote after a certain time. Like once the leader has completed one lap, votes are automatically cancelled.

Vain
6th March 2006, 12:26
I thought this was incredibly rude.That's what people are.
It's always "I want to have fun and I don't care about you". Anti-social behaviour is the trademark of any anonymous interaction.
(The countermeasures would be either punishment or removal of the anonymousity, but this is leading beyond the scope of the thread.)

Being rude those people won't read this forum. So as noble as your aim is I believe the topic won't have any effect.

Vain

AndroidXP
6th March 2006, 12:32
That wouldn't work. Example: two guys are driving shittily around the track, one completes a lap. Then five other people join, everyone wants to restart, but hey, LFS says "no".

Gentlefoot
6th March 2006, 12:33
It has the effect of making me feel better:)

Scawen
6th March 2006, 12:35
Maybe hosts should use the /rstend setting?

For example : /rstend 90

That would disallow votes to restart for 90 seconds after the winner finishes the race.

Chaos
6th March 2006, 12:38
I think he means that people vote (and pass) a restart on lap 9 of 10...

mkinnov8
6th March 2006, 12:51
Maybe hosts should use the /rstend setting?

For example : /rstend 90

That would disallow votes to restart for 90 seconds after the winner finishes the race.

I dont feel this is a particularly big issue, is it / would it be possible to have something where hosts could disable the restart commands from drivers, (like taking away the kick / ban voting), and have LFS display a message like "Race In Progress!"

People tend to just not listen to hosts when the option is there and known.

Gunn
6th March 2006, 12:53
Yes it is incredibly unfortunate and very selfish. Happened to me too a while back, a friend and I were starting lap nine of ten and it was still a close battle. Then two guys joined and ended our race. When I explained to them that it is a good idea to see what's happening on a server before diving in one guy said "stfu we want to race now". I said "well we wanted to race too but you ended it for us prematurely". He says "so what, four people are better than two". We disconnected and left the two of them to play by/with themselves.

Please racers, always consider what's happening before voting to restart or change tracks or whatever. If in a race you vote to restart but don't get enough supporting votes to initiate a new race, then leave it be, don't spam up the screen with restarts when the consensus is not with you.

If you jam your car into the wall at T1 and nobody else does, that's tough titties sunshine. That's the way the cookie bounces.

If you join a server it only takes a few seconds to ask "are you guys racing or practising?" A bit of latitude goes a long way towards an enjoyable session and people will respect you for it.

My 2c after tax.

Iron_Maiden
6th March 2006, 12:59
yeah its pretty annoying...I'd probably have triple the number of wins without this....

B2B@300
6th March 2006, 13:01
If you jam your car into the wall at T1 and nobody else does, that's tough titties sunshine. That's the way the cookie bounces.

If you join a server it only takes a few seconds to ask "are you guys racing or practising?" A bit of latitude goes a long way towards an enjoyable session and people will respect you for it.

Totally agree with you there Gunn, seems this common courtesy isn’t so common sometimes…

mr_x
6th March 2006, 13:31
i agree with everything thats been said, very annoying, maybe some form of system so that if the leader or top 3 accept the restart then the race will restart, this would stop races being restarted on lap 6/10:scratchch

jtr99
6th March 2006, 13:36
Definitely an annoying problem but Vain is right to point out that the people who cause this problem are unlikely to be engaging in rational discussion on the forums.

I'm generally in favour of a one-person one-vote approach to democracy, but I wonder if weighted voting could be a solution:

For restart votes after a race has ended, everyone gets one vote, as usual.
But for restart votes during a race, your vote is multiplied by the number of laps you've completed in the race. (Or let's say number of laps plus one, to avoid multiplication by zero.) So in the race described by Gunn, he and his friend (on lap 9) would get 10 implicit negative votes each, that far outweighed the 2 restart votes of the two newcomers, and the race would not have been restarted.
Note that in the event that there's a lap 1, turn 1 disaster and the majority of the field agrees on a restart, OK, that still works as in the current system. Everyone's completed zero laps and everyone gets 1 vote.
If two people have driven 20 laps together but they're only practicing, then 5 more people log onto the server and all agree that a restart would be a good idea, then a restart can happen although it's true that the two who have been racing get much more voting power. In other words, the two long-term drivers can completely veto a restart, but I think this is only fair. They may in fact be racing. If everyone wants a restart, of course it still happens.I can't see any difficulties in implementing this. I'm trying hard to think of a way in which such a system could be abused: I guess we could have weird situations in which a single driver sets up a server for a 50 lap race, drives 25 laps alone, and then acquires the voting power to block restart votes by 20 new arrivals. But that seems unlikely to happen much in reality.

Hmm.. maybe this should go in the Suggested improvements forum.

Gunn
6th March 2006, 13:38
I prefer no restarts at all, but I'm not everybody. Scawen's earlier post is a good solution for managed servers.

richy
6th March 2006, 13:48
I prefer no restarts at all, but I'm not everybody. Scawen's earlier post is a good solution for managed servers.

me too,

also admins tend to restart because they crashed out or two of their team crashed out, but if others crash they wont. :razz:

Gentlefoot
6th March 2006, 14:10
Yes Richy that's true. I was playing on Saturday and there were these two racers (who will remain nameless) from the same team (same skins at least). Pretty sure one of the racers was admin on the server. I was spectating and the race restarted 3 times. Each time these two had crashed. On the fourth occasion both these two made it to the front and surprise surprise - no restart. I left at that point.

danowat
6th March 2006, 14:40
On the flip side of this, does anyone else get fed up waiting for the vote to be passed for a new race after one has just finished?, sometimes it can be anything up to 5 mins before enough people have voted to restart, thats quite frustrating.

Maybe an after race time limit, so if a vote hasnt passed before a certain amount of time, it restarts.

Dan,

franky500
6th March 2006, 14:50
perhaps it should be locked restart in race unless the top 3 people vote to restart or something. And at end of race if no restart after 2 minutes it could be done automatically....

I have no idea what i am talking about but today seems to be a good day to post so..

Vain
6th March 2006, 15:09
My suggestion: Adaptive restart-poll.
In the beginning of the race a 50% majority may decide to restart the race. Then the race will restart.
After the first lap is finished the treshold is raised to 75 percent.
Two minutes after the leader has finished the race the treshold is lowered to 30%.

Opinions?

Vain

B2B@300
6th March 2006, 15:18
Opinions?

:thumb: gets my vote!
But maybe in combination with needing the two leading drivers to vote as well as having a 75% majority for the second one...

Vain
6th March 2006, 15:38
Please keep the mechanism as simple as possible.

Vain

mrbogeyman
6th March 2006, 16:02
Or a server side option that only lets you restart in the first 10% of a race, i.e. a 15lap race you can only restart before 1.5laps. Obviously rules such as these needs overrides, so maybe a 80%-90% vote will still allow a restart.

As Scawen said, restarts can be disabled for the first 90s, but IMO you should be able to set this as a number of laps and/or a percentage of the race distance BEFORE which you can restart. However, 'the /rstend 90' command obviously does the opposite of what people are asking for, only disabling restarts for 90sec instead of the whole race.

It is a tricky balance for those servers which require these features, in my experience I only wish I had these features when I was racing with small numbers of racers.

Theafro
6th March 2006, 16:08
I agree with vain,
It would be cool to have a command like "/rstend" but for all stages of the race (kinda like a restart 'envelope'), it would make setting up a tiny bit more complicated but you'll end up with a nicely balanced enviroment after a bit of fiddling/testing.

something like:

/rstmin 30,50 (time limit,majority required)
/rstmid 70 (majority required between start/finish)
/rstend 90,30 (time limit,majority required)

give it a few months and put the best settings in the default cfg script you get when you D/L the dedi server.

alternatively just turn mid-race join off, it's annoying for those who respect others but even more annoying for the ignorant, it works tho'.

vanirl
6th March 2006, 18:48
While I have not as yet read every single post / reply / opinion I just had put “pen to paper” on this topic. How many posts have been made over the years about the realism of Live For speed?. Things like

this is a SIM and not a game:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
the physics of the sims / game are not real enough and need to be improved
or
some other comments as to the fantastic realism of Live for speed

Why then to we have re starts at all? :scratchch Yes I know that in REAL LIFE the concept of a red flag or re start is there.
But this is for SAFETY reasons and not any other – no lives can be lost in Live for Speed – other than by raised blood pressure if some “person” keeps messing things up.:drunk:

Here my vote / opinion
Re starts CAN be made

after the top three drives have finished a race
if only one single driver starts a race (waiting for other to join)
if only one single driver left in a race (other have left the server)
NO restarts if

race has started (subject to 2 & 3 above)
Top 3 positions not yet determined
Lets get really real and award the laurels to drives that get to the end of a race unscathed and not those that keep restarting until they get to a good position after turn 1

Gretzkyyzerman
6th March 2006, 18:55
@Gentlefoot: I think it was me who got this remark ("so what"), and boy, was I pissed off... :-( ... as all above stated, that's a selfish behaviour and in my opinion would be enough to ban these people from the server so maybe then they can think about it for some time

@Scarwen: concerning the "/rstend" option, I think it would deprive the majority of "reasonable" gamers of an option necessary in some cases... consider a race where 90 % of racers crash in T1 and block the way for all others... or a wrecker who "eliminates" the leading three racers... so, in some cases, an option to have a restart is really necessary, but it should be approved by all participants in the ongoing race... why not implement that feature?

Pellit
6th March 2006, 19:30
Something has been really annoying me lately, particularly on demo servers so I thought I'd start this thread in an attempt to educate the offending drivers.

When a 10 lap race is in progress, say 5 laps in maybe, DO NOT vote to restart. Instead, wait for the race to end and then vote restart.

I was on the CRC demo server the other day and it was lap 4 of 5. One guy kept voting to restart. Another guy just behind me in the race asked him to stop. He explained that people were still racing. The response was "so what". I thought this was incredibly rude.

The amount of times I will be nearing the end of the lap, right at the front because others were involved in accidents and it gets restarted. How annoying!

Another time, I joined a race mid way through and on the last lap I was on a flyer. Thought I was about to beat my PB but just as I came through the last complex, the race was restarted and I didn't get my time. I also lost my grid position.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE CAN EVERYONE WAIT UNTIL ALL RACERS HAVE COMPLETED THEIR RACE BEFORE VOTING TO RESTART

i agree, its so annoying, especially as i'm kind of new so when i get a good spot them lose it due to some idiots restarting....grrr....lol:x

Gimpster
6th March 2006, 20:23
alternatively just turn mid-race join off, it's annoying for those who respect others but even more annoying for the ignorant, it works tho'.

There is a bug with midrace join though. If every leaves the race and no one finishes then the server is locked until an admin can free it. You can only vote to end or restart if you are on the track, but you can't get on the track because a race is in progress. Its a visious cycle.

The whole system needs to be re-evaluated. The laps completeld=voting weight is a good idea. That added to a revamp of the race joinging rules would probaly be the most effective and simple solution.

In the mean time, if you want to attract more dedicated good drivers, put up a server with longer races, no mid join and voting restrictions.

o000o
6th March 2006, 20:41
Anything automated you can think of will be exploited, the only answer is admin present on the servers.

Another game I play has moderators that can go in any server and admin. These people are normal but respected players who are invited by the mod department to become mods, if they accept, they are then trained in administrating and have a [Mod] tag placed on the end of their name. They are effectively a policing dept and the system works very well, they just play as normal but can take control of the server if needed and kick unruly players. The server list shows if a mod is present in a server so you know you can have a hastle free time in there.

Could such a system be employed here for the demo servers?

mrodgers
6th March 2006, 23:43
First I want to say that alot of you mentioned what Scawen said about the "/restend 90" command and most commented like that was no restart until 90 seconds after race start. That command is no restart for 90 seconds after the leader finishes the race to allow everyone else to finish without it being restarted.

On that note, I love the /restend command as it is so frustrating to be on the last lap and the race restart without recording a finishing position for if, for example, you save replays, or just generally like to finish the race. I like to finish, whether it's for first or for nineth.

I hate most other restart votes at the beginning of the race when people crash out and expect everyone else to restart. I say most and not all because, I do like when I'm in a server full of good racers and an incident happen, to restart to get everyone back in. There have been times where I've run to 1st or 2nd and voted a restart because I want the full field as I've been enjoying racing with all of them. I think maybe a restart should depend on at least 1 of the current top 3 positions voting for a restart, maybe past a certain point or something.

I've been in situations where I've crashed out at the start, and had others ask me if I want a restart. I usually say, it's up to the leaders. I can wait 7 freakin minutes and just run at the tail practicing some offline running or something. If those who are up front want me in, then I'll give them the choice to restart to get me back in.

Some of the ideas up above are pretty good, like the weighted vote depending on how much of the race has gone on.

@Gimpster, I think I was the first to bring to the forum about the no-midjoin bug. I was in a server with 1 other person and we were sitting front bumper to front bumper admiring and talking car skins. He was facing in reverse and started to go, the wrong way. He got kicked to spectate. At the same time, I was sitting next to the exit of the closed pitlane of Aston Nat, and I thought, hmm, wonder if I can go through or is it blocked? So I went into the pits the wrong way and got kicked to spectate. So, we were both in spectate with no-midjoin on and couldn't do anything. We fixed it by both disconnecting and reconnecting again.

B2B@300
6th March 2006, 23:54
Could such a system be employed here for the demo servers?

Quite possibly, but the only way to do it at the moment is to give out the server Admin password to trusted individuals... not many want to do this.

I have thought for awhile now it would be good if servers had three accounts instead of two i.e. Admin, Guest and Moderator accounts.

That way you could issue the Mod password to quite a number of people without compromising the Admin password/security of the server your running.

It would also work well with your sujestion in that many unrelated servers could have different Admin passwords but the same Mod password if the community decided to band together in the way you discribe.

Fonnybone
7th March 2006, 14:42
Maybe hosts should use the /rstend setting?

For example : /rstend 90

That would disallow votes to restart for 90 seconds after the winner finishes the race.

Yep, i think this is a nice and simple option that servers could use.
Might be good to have a certain value by default in case there's
no admin present. I'd also add a flood protection. I was playing BF2 last
night and got carried away with the voice coms and the game started
yelling at me "Stop yaking and start fighting soldier !", hehe.

NaBUru38
7th March 2006, 19:34
About the first corner restart: the >50% limit could be reduced if the grid is large enough (if four out of eleven crash, it wouldn't be wrong if the race restarted.

About mid-race restarting: after everyone passes the first track split, jtr's idea looks OK for me (it will nedd discussion, of course). An alternative is to make that if there is one person in the server and two join, the two can restart the race despite the leader's opinion.

About end of race restarting, votes should be forbidden until each driver passes the finidshing line, with a 45s/split limit: in a track with 3 splits (S1, S2 and finish line), after the leader passes the finish line drivers in the first split have 2:15 minutes to finish, drivers in the second split 1:30 min and drivers in the last one 45s. If someone does not finish in time, restart is allowed.
If servers don't want this option, they could deactivate it (or viceversa, those who want it could activate it).

ajp71
7th March 2006, 22:13
What about a system where you can veto a restart if your still racing, this would still allow a restart in a server with no one left in a race or when everyone is happy with it.

AndroidXP
7th March 2006, 22:18
Then we'd have retards vetoing just for the hell of it :shrug: