Cleanup : Spam [Archive] - Page 3

KSheppard

30th June 2009, 11:35

I agree about the scirocco, I get that it helps prove the physics if a real car with real values can handle like the real thing and turn similiar lap times AND I get that it can be a real help during real life testing (ie. uni. students involved with the fsae mrt project can get more testing time). But kinda breaks down if we aint got a real track, now I'll never get to drive monaco so really it's a "fantasy" track for me too.

What I'd really like is rain, night.

!!the king!!

30th June 2009, 12:37

Well, try a fresh install of Z, test that again and update that one to Z13, maybe something in your LFS graphics settings got changed and you weren't aware. Also check out the shadows settings off/low res/high res. Improvements in the shadow quality might be effecting you FPS.
thx

!!the king!!

30th June 2009, 13:09

update LFS its graphics setups, look there about I think, or...wrong
thx

DEVIL 007

30th June 2009, 20:04

Just wonder why they did not accept another offer from Skoda like a few years ago for a real car in game for free. Yeh I know it was just Skoda Octavia but better to start somewhere then nowhere. They postponed it becuase they wanted to focus on something else. Its all the time like that.

I know Scawen do great job but I bet he can do much better as Eric could as well.

Kindna offtopic the above from me but when I am hearing more and more from old hardcore players that things with LFS go slower and slower its really sad :-(.

Gabkicks

30th June 2009, 20:51

:doh:

"We plan to fix the bugs and continue developing the Scirocco suspension and electronic control systems, to give you a good patch early in 2009."

lol are we are halfway through the year. What could have caused Scavier to underestimate the release of the next patch by months?/ OT spam

Byku

30th June 2009, 21:00

Just wonder why they did not accept another offer from Skoda like a year ago for a real car in game for free. Yeh I know it was just Skoda Octavia but better to start somewhere then nowhere. They postponed it becuase they wanted to focus on something else. Its all the time like that.

I know Scawen do great job but I bet he can do much better as Eric could as well.

Kindna offtopic the above from me but when I am hearing more and more from old hardcore players that things with LFS go slower and slower its really sad :-(.

They had an offer from Skoda!? O.o Which model of Octavia?

DEVIL 007

30th June 2009, 21:14

They had an offer from Skoda!? O.o Which model of Octavia?
yes they had.
It was facelifted Skoda Octavia I. Not the latest one. What a shame.

Dan Rabelo

30th June 2009, 23:19

What bothered me is not the delay in developing the game, but the lack of information on the development of LFS,! It seems that they do not give us the minimum!

alliennas

1st July 2009, 05:57

Sad indeed. No progress information at all..

Gudowski

1st July 2009, 06:14

pasibrzuch

1st July 2009, 07:46

Oh please, another full page of off-top, stop.

Would you like to have army of zombies knocking to the door while you're packing present in the rush?

DEVIL 007

1st July 2009, 10:40

Yeh, it should be clean here I agree and added a piece of crap too but there must be something wrong from other side as well if people post these message a lot sometimes. Try to think about it as well. Lack of comunication is the worst thing which can happend - proved. No matter if its in game development like LFS where the comunication have been much better before then now or in business for example.

I was always so much impressed by what Scawen and whole team around LFS achieved. Kudos to them for that but the other thing which I am not really happy about how more and more the LFS is draw apart from the technicall progress in game industry. For example when LFS started with DX7 there was not much more around but now. The gap is getting bigger and bigger.

Should shut my mouth though:x

Keep LFS dev your good work but start adding something more...

logitekg25

1st July 2009, 18:22

from one side its good option, coz when devs informing when they rls patch forum going weird situations, from second side its really bad movement, because they can do weekly or monthly "to do list" and inform ppl what they maked by one month, without releasing a patch. But ppl then can see that devs working on lfs.

50/50

mabe they can do a monthly poll or something about what people want them to work on. like instead of a new patch fixing, idk maybe a bug on the graphics, maybe people could vote to just keep working on the sciroco. or however you spell it :razz:

marzman

2nd July 2009, 06:57

mabe they can do a monthly poll or something about what people want them to work on. like instead of a new patch fixing, idk maybe a bug on the graphics, maybe people could vote to just keep working on the sciroco. or however you spell it :razz:
Maybe they don't want that? They just work on LFS.

alliennas

2nd July 2009, 08:38

I'm just having a thought. LFS using direct X 7, right? and some peaple has laggy races with decent computers. Why? Because of huge physics calculations?
EDIT: I know nothing about computers

MadCatX

2nd July 2009, 09:05

Your point?

Krammeh

2nd July 2009, 10:05

I'm just having a thought. LFS using direct X 7, right? and some peaple has laggy races with decent computers. Why? Because of huge physics calculations?
EDIT: I know nothing about computers

Define 'decent'.

I don't lag at all with a full 32 grid

alliennas

2nd July 2009, 10:30

Define 'decent'.

I don't lag at all with a full 32 grid

Dell Inspiron 1520
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 2.00 GHz
Memory 2.00 GB
NVIDIA 8400M GS
Fresh instal of LFS

Krammeh

2nd July 2009, 11:27

Dell Inspiron 1520
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 2.00 GHz
Memory 2.00 GB
NVIDIA 8400M GS
Fresh instal of LFS
not exactly a killer graphics card.

Also, make sure the power rating is not set to energy saving, or balanced. Whack it onto the Performance setting.

alliennas

2nd July 2009, 12:34

not exactly a killer graphics card.

Also, make sure the power rating is not set to energy saving, or balanced. Whack it onto the Performance setting.

performence increased a bit, thx :thumbsup:

Krammeh

2nd July 2009, 17:44

performence increased a bit, thx :thumbsup:
No probs!

logitekg25

2nd July 2009, 17:53

where do you extract it to? :really:

G!NhO

2nd July 2009, 17:53

lfs maybe? :really:

logitekg25

2nd July 2009, 17:54

lfs maybe? :really:

so anywhere in my lfs folder, or extract it directly to the lfs link :shrug:

i am such a noob with computers :x

G!NhO

2nd July 2009, 17:58

so anywhere in my lfs folder, or extract it directly to the lfs link :shrug:

i am such a noob with computers :x

just extract it to your lfs folder

logitekg25

2nd July 2009, 17:59

just extract it to your lfs folder

ok thanks :thumb:

S3ANPukekoh3

3rd July 2009, 12:55

I hate the world

alliennas

3rd July 2009, 14:16

I hate the world

I bet we all know why.

Chacall Br

3rd July 2009, 14:16

What it takes to leave the new car, new or upgrade, it seems that the end of the game, I think I will have no more updates:(

jus_kool1345

3rd July 2009, 16:21

not sure if here is the right place to post but i am just wondering if there is a time frame for the vws to be released.

Deutschland2007

3rd July 2009, 16:29

not sure if here is the right place to post but i am just wondering if there is a time frame for the vws to be released.

This really is the worst place to post. The devs don´t give us a date or a time where they think they gonna release it anymore because if they can´t for any reason, everyone starts moaning again with "Where is my Scirocco?! Why isn´t it released yet!". Scawen only said (atleast I think he did) that the Scirocco amongst with all the other updates is gonna be released this year.

alliennas

3rd July 2009, 17:36

spam alert :schwitz:

jasonmatthews

11th July 2009, 00:23

Anyone thought for 1 second that if you stop posting bug reports (usually bogus btw) then maybe we might get an update, as no update can happen until the fixes are done :nod:

So please, please, please, stop posting unless you REALLY are sure that your problem is to do with the very latest patch (Z15 atm), as everything you post takes the release date for the next update further away, as Scawen will fix the bugs (or investigate all the BullShit ones) before he releases the updates :shrug:

baSh0r

11th July 2009, 05:13

what a senseless patch. Release the damn scirocco

Just my 2 cents

ekze

11th July 2009, 05:16

no one cares about you, baSh0r

baSh0r

11th July 2009, 06:28

Thanks a lot. Keep on waiting a little more, maybe this satisfies your needs

fireb0llch

11th July 2009, 07:11

what a senseless patch. Release the damn scirocco

Just my 2 cents

Do you want an unfinished Version, just you can drive a bugged VW Scirocco? I just sometimes dont understand peoples. :shrug:

N I K I

11th July 2009, 07:31

Do you want an unfinished Version, just you can drive a bugged VW Scirocco? I just sometimes dont understand peoples. :shrug:
wth these shadows have to do with Scirocco???

UnknownMaster21

11th July 2009, 07:35

In Real Life you can buy a Scirocco for yourself, of course, a bit expensive...

baSh0r

11th July 2009, 07:45

Do you want an unfinished Version, just you can drive a bugged VW Scirocco? I just sometimes dont understand peoples. :shrug:

You people seriously do not get it. It's been more than a damn half year to fix everything. In that time i model the car, do the physics, implement it and masturbate 2 times.

The Very End

11th July 2009, 08:11

Let's not go down that route, keep this topic clean from spam and such. It's all about reporting errors in the new test version.

fireb0llch

11th July 2009, 08:14

You people seriously do not get it. It's been more than a damn half year to fix everything. In that time i model the car, do the physics, implement it and masturbate 2 times.

And again the same discuss again. The Dev's just want to release a Version without big bugs (or you want to play with bugs???)

wth these shadows have to do with Scirocco???

Nothing, was just a comment to bashor.

btt: Patch works here great. Thx.

EDIT://

Im tired to discuss with you bashor.... Just let Dev's do the work ok?

baSh0r

11th July 2009, 08:17

I don't like to play with bugs, i find insects disgusting.

N I K I

11th July 2009, 08:19

he loves bugs, he's rFactor fanatic :D

ATHome

11th July 2009, 08:21

I don't like to play with bugs, i find insects disgusting.

Why not just stfu and play something else, you make ist sound like your life depends on LFS.

If that's the case, then... well... poor boy :razz:

baSh0r

11th July 2009, 08:22

he loves bugs, he's rFactor fanatic

How delightful. I never knew you were able to judge about bugs since the only thing you are playing with are dolls or your imaginary friend Carlos.
I like seeing you in love with those magical Bugcurbs and Rolling or Flipping cars.

Why not just stfu and play something else, you make ist sound like your life depends on LFS.

If that's the case, then... well... poor boy :razz:

I do play real life motorsport

N I K I

11th July 2009, 08:25

whatever

what that has to do with anything? Just admit it, you got owned by various ppl here :P

baSh0r

11th July 2009, 08:25

I like where this thread is going :)

Beer someone?

N I K I

11th July 2009, 08:27

:drink:

ATHome

11th July 2009, 08:33

I do play real life motorsport

Ahh, I see, then you're just another whiny german. You know we are famous for that kind of behaviour. And I tend to think it is well deserved.

/OT End

steve30x

18th July 2009, 22:24

WIN 7 RC1 - practically same a the version which will be sold

RC1 is far from the final build. The RC1 isnt near as stable or fast as the RTM. I have the final build and RC1 is slower with a lot of bugs and compatability problems. There is a big difference between RC1 and RTM in all aspects of the OS.

Anyway when are we going to get the Scirocco that we werte promised 7 months ago. I havent tested this patch yet but I will test it on monday.

Electric Eye

19th July 2009, 16:24

Anyway when are we going to get the Scirocco that we werte promised 7 months ago. I havent tested this patch yet but I will test it on monday.

Next christmas!

danthebangerboy

19th July 2009, 16:35

Anyway when are we going to get the Scirocco that we werte promised 7 months ago.

There wasn't a promise of a date, just a hopeful idea that it would be early this year sometime, i can't imagine that it will be much longer tho, although that is only my opinion, its anybodys guess really.

Chrisuu01

20th July 2009, 11:04

There wasn't a promise of a date, just a hopeful idea that it would be early this year sometime, i can't imagine that it will be much longer tho, although that is only my opinion, its anybodys guess really.
Its July its not early anymore its even getting near august...
Not to be realy negative or anything but if people stil cal this early 2009 I freel like kicking there asses.

I seem to have an isseu with sound simetimes things the first fex secons me has nou sound ona new track.
When im on teh starting grid?

webdigga

20th July 2009, 12:34

Its July its not early anymore its even getting near august...
Not to be realy negative or anything but if people stil cal this early 2009 I freel like kicking there asses.

He wasn't saying we are still in the early part of the year.

Nothing has been promised, they just hoped to have it released early this year. They never said it definitely would be.

CodieMorgan

21st July 2009, 09:20

Oops.

CodieMorgan

21st July 2009, 09:22

I seem to have an isseu with sound simetimes things the first fex secons me has nou sound ona new track.
When im on the starting grid?

Ok man. You had too many beers. Your speech is slurring into your keyboard! :color:

BOSCHO

21st July 2009, 11:02

Ok man. You had too many beers. Your speech is slurring into your keyboard! :color:

stop the spam :schwitz:

killer sponge

11th August 2009, 12:47

Deutschland2007

11th August 2009, 13:00

NOTE: THE VW SCIROCCO IS NOT INCLUDED

do you guys know that it was postponed to 'early 2009'?
that 1 or 2 guys made a mod for it faster then the lfs team?
that its the 8th month of 2009 ?
that there hasnt been 1 single sign of life on the homepage on lfs of the LFS team since 15 december last year?

Cmon guys, expand the team a bit. would be allot more fun for the thousands of racers...

1) The Scirocco mod is rubbish because it´s just a modded FXO.
2) The devs are working on it and the coming patch will include alot more than just the Scirocco. And they wanna release something finished not something that´s been rushed and has lots of bugs
3) Show some patience

PioneerLv

21st August 2009, 08:23

I heard S3 will be done soon.

Flame CZE

21st August 2009, 08:31

I heard S3 will be done soon.
Who told you?

Dajmin

21st August 2009, 09:14

The pixies at the bottom of his garden.

PioneerLv

21st August 2009, 09:22

I had a vision.

Flame CZE

21st August 2009, 09:50

I had a vision.
You dont have to spam the test patch thread though.

PioneerLv

21st August 2009, 12:34

This sucks. Hate me.

Takumi_lfs

5th September 2009, 16:02

What day is wensday? :tilt:

spiderbait90

5th September 2009, 16:17

My birthday... 09/09/09.

I don't think anything will be released on that day, if that is what you are hinting at?

UnknownMaster21

6th September 2009, 07:39

OT but we are going to 2010 :)

FlyingSam

9th September 2009, 18:58

My birthday... 09/09/09.

I don't think anything will be released on that day, if that is what you are hinting at?

Happy birthday! Without news about LFS, you were right :nod:

BIzO

25th September 2009, 20:18

...

What ?? Chuck Norris had an error with his game ? :jawdrop:

nesrulz

26th September 2009, 05:55

What ?? Chuck Norris had an error with his game ? :jawdrop:

:D

Sry for OT. :)

HyRaNk

26th September 2009, 14:50

when release scirocco?

Silverracer

26th September 2009, 14:56

when release scirocco?
Its not announced yet, keep popping in to lfs.net or the forums from time to time to see if its out (:

PS: Demo since '05; Maybe they're waiting for you to get S2 :P

Pilot X

26th September 2009, 15:40

PS: Demo since '05; Maybe they're waiting for you to get S2 :P[2]

:yikes:

JasonJ

28th September 2009, 01:19

the game freezes for 5 seconds when the message in the attachment comes up
and when i hit the button to take an image (print screen).. lfs freeze for 3 seconds and after the freeze i have 5 fps for 1 second and then the fts goes up to my normal
im with windows 7 final and galaxy (nvidia) gf 9500 with intel D 2.8, ram 2 gb
never had that problem with older patchesJust noticed you say you use print screen and don't mention Ctrl+S (screenshot). Is this because you use enbSeries addon? That mod won't allow Ctrl+S and also pauses the game for 5 secs when you use PrtSc with enbSeries. Just thought I'd mention it because the symtoms look the same. Sorry if I am wrong.

AndroidXP

28th September 2009, 09:41

the Ctrl+S works but the images with it are with poor quality than with the PrtScHuh? Can you please post an example of this? Ctrl-S saves as bmp, which uses no compression and should therefore be 100% quality.

BOSCHO

28th September 2009, 10:00

AndroidXP

28th September 2009, 10:19

Yeah, but that's because with PrtScr you paste it into an image editing program and save it as PNG, which uses lossless compression resulting in a smaller filesize without quality loss. When posting stuff on the web you should use JPEG anyway, since the file size will be smaller by an order of magnitude compared to PNG. The only exception for that is simple graphics (few colours used and large areas having the same colour) and/or pictures where the quality is of utmost importance.

geeman1

28th September 2009, 10:31

OffTopic
Lol messed up
i mean the image size is bigger but the quality the same and when i take a screen with ctrl+s is about 3.xx bytes and when i take it with prtscr is about 1.xx (2mb difference) bytes and its a lot of work when i take more than 1 screen and need to compress it to upload it in websites that the most have 2mb allowed image space.The image in the attachment is 1.85 mb with prtscr and with control+s is 3.75 that i CANT upload it here (needs compress)
This is going way offtopic, but:
1. It's kind of your fault if you are using something other than the built-in feature (Ctrl+S)
2. Don't use PNGs for LFS screenshots, they are huge. The example you posted is almost 2MB which is massive. You should use JPG instead. That image would probably go down to 200KB or something and the quality loss would be almost invisible.
3. There are batch converters for images availabe which can compress the whole folder of images with a few clicks. I prefer IrfanView (http://www.irfanview.com/).

need

28th September 2009, 11:36

As an example, I changed your picture to jpg, without doing anything else to it at all.

Shadowww

29th September 2009, 12:22

2. Don't use PNGs for LFS screenshots, they are huge.Not always.

AndroidXP

29th September 2009, 12:44

Yeah, if you screenshot a pitch black area then they would not be huge :rolleyes:
They will be huge if the picture contains lots of detail, which screenshots tend to have.

Shadowww

29th September 2009, 12:48

Nah the best screenshooter is DXRipper.

You can change resolution/textures/objects etc before rendering the final shot as JPG.

geeman1

29th September 2009, 14:28

Not always.I can't imagine any situation where that wouldn't be the case. Even if such situation exists a JPG would be reasonably small anyway.

Shadowww

29th September 2009, 14:49

I can't imagine any situation where that wouldn't be the case. Even if such situation exists a JPG would be reasonably small anyway.Reasonably small? 33kb PNG, 200kb JPG. Not LFS screenshot, but still.

geeman1

29th September 2009, 17:31

Reasonably small? 33kb PNG, 200kb JPG. Not LFS screenshot, but still.Yeah. PNG is better and smaller for certain types of pictures, but LFS screenshots are not one of those types. I didn't mean JPGs are always better for all images.

Check out this url http://www.r1ch.net/img-formats/ (there is a conclusion at the end for lazy people)

BOSCHO

30th September 2009, 09:12

png is for transparent backgrounds and jpg for the rest

Shadowww

30th September 2009, 09:32

png is for transparent backgrounds and jpg for the restWrong. Would you screenshoot some application to PNG? That's just dumb. :)

BOSCHO

30th September 2009, 10:01

Wrong. Would you screenshoot some application to PNG? That's just dumb. :)

for image editing only like my avatar i made it with transparent background

Shadowww

30th September 2009, 10:34

for image editing only like my avatar i made it with transparent backgroundTry saving this picture as JPG and look at it's size.

BOSCHO

30th September 2009, 10:53

no big diff same quality..
ps: too much offtopic :schwitz:

Shadowww

30th September 2009, 11:07

no big diff same quality..Same quality? Post teh jpg here. :)

BOSCHO

30th September 2009, 18:19

Same quality? Post teh jpg here. :)

if you zoom it you can see the diff but in original size they are the same

AndroidXP

30th September 2009, 18:26

You can see the diff quite clearly without zooming in and both JPEGs are larger than the PNG. Since this screenshot has lots of large uniform spaces the PNG's compression can work better here.

BOSCHO

30th September 2009, 18:31

You can see the diff quite clearly without zooming in and both JPEGs are larger than the PNG. Since this screenshot has lots of large uniform spaces the PNG's compression can work better here.

ya the color of the jpg's is more... uncolored :D

pik_d

1st October 2009, 03:23

Try saving this picture as JPG and look at it's size.
Look, only 47KB!

Shadowww

1st October 2009, 07:32

Look, only 47KB!Look, only 29kb!

cmanns

3rd October 2009, 17:32

Came to LFS forum, got excited and clicked the new patch URL.

Sad panda is sad, VWS w/out new tyre physics would be a treat for all before it gets boring w/the new physics, let us get bored of it with the old so when every cars new....

Make sense? Yes it does! Very much sense that it'd be a HUGE change in LFS, then the new tyre physics would be even more amazing whenever launched.

I'm tired and bored of all the current LFS cars, with new tyre phy they'd be nice because the handling is horribly unrealistic sometimes (XRT w/mouse I can HARDLY control, yet I can XRR no prob and XRG) people say mouse is faster, well I'm pretty damn good at mouse though I don't do real "racing" on LFS I find XRT just burns up tires, etc.

Oh and I'll post a new feature thingy.

ws.c server is getting a lot of x16 disconnects. all at once and it looks like its every one that is on x16
WS.C sucks, bunch of kids so what big deal is that?

gotspeed

3rd October 2009, 17:41

Came to LFS forum, got excited and clicked the new patch URL.

Sad panda is sad, VWS w/out new tyre physics would be a treat for all before it gets boring w/the new physics, let us get bored of it with the old so when every cars new....

Make sense? Yes it does! Very much sense that it'd be a HUGE change in LFS, then the new tyre physics would be even more amazing whenever launched.

I'm tired and bored of all the current LFS cars, with new tyre phy they'd be nice because the handling is horribly unrealistic sometimes (XRT w/mouse I can HARDLY control, yet I can XRR no prob and XRG) people say mouse is faster, well I'm pretty damn good at mouse though I don't do real "racing" on LFS I find XRT just burns up tires, etc.

Oh and I'll post a new feature thingy.

WS.C sucks, bunch of kids so what big deal is that?

that coming from someone conpairing a gt car on street tires to a full gtr car on slicks duh there different. facepalm.jpg

Shadowww

3rd October 2009, 17:49

WS.C sucks, bunch of kids so what big deal is that?You misspelled "LTC", Sir.

hsvdt

12th October 2009, 21:04

I don't know if this is the right place but what i would like to see is when changing gears the driver moves a gear shift leaver
its just a thought and I dont care if anyone diasagress

Degats

12th October 2009, 21:12

I don't know if this is the right place but what i would like to see is when changing gears the driver moves a gear shift leaver
its just a thought and I dont care if anyone diasagress

Should be in the Improvement Suggestions forum.

As ever, the problem with that is that you've finished changing gear by the time the animation would even reach the shifter as it can't predict when you're going to change gear.

TDU compensates by reaching down when it thinks you're going to change, which can look weird as it's often wrong and reaches down for no reason. Other times when you shift and it's not expecting it, it doesn't move at all.

Personally I'd prefer it not to be there at all as it will always look unnatural, but I'm sure others would disagree with me ;)

/offtopic

MrPDR

18th October 2009, 07:03

swingkid

18th October 2009, 07:31

I'm not understanding the importance of all of these minor things every patch fixes. 99% of the time they never had an influence on the quality of the game.
30 test patches, very nit picky and pointless - skip to the real updates.

Sorry, post seems crude, but I doubt i'm alone in what i say. Please understand.
that's your problem
you don't have to download/test them ,just wait for the finished patch

now scawen can tackle one problem at the time an progress quicker

MrPDR

18th October 2009, 07:55

Oh so you prefer all the major updates are released nao and your game goes to a black screen when you open it? :really:
Sounds like fun.

My definition of now seems to be completely different from yours. I understand that working on this game isn't easy, at all. I'm also unaware if it's just the three core devs working on it or multiple parties.
Either way, i'm in no position to completely complain. But I am in position to give feedback as a player in this community.

Based from what i've seen in the past years with LFS, development is an extremely long process. I don't even expect new tracks to release unless they are gapped years apart from each other.

-Tire physics are coming (hopefully noticeable results)
-New track is coming
-New car is coming (hopefully)

Those are all positive outcomes of a 6 year development process.
Hopefully the gap between time/product shortens as the months roll by.

-This is not a flame.
-This is a comment contributing feedback based on observation
-Respond with a bit of respect plz, we're all playing the same game here, let's make it worth our time

*edit*
=)

IlGuercio

18th October 2009, 08:34

Keep the damn whining away from this topic.

MrPDR

18th October 2009, 09:01

Keep the damn whining away from this topic.

This a feedback thread. Keep up with the pace and read each post.

Also; Today there seemed to be a problem with the throttle actually working for all the drivers on Aston- Cadet rev, T1. Drivers would go to the turn and complain that their throttle would drop off, and continue as normal soon after. Anyone got anything?

IlGuercio

18th October 2009, 09:35

This a feedback thread.
No,it's a test patch thread,the title says it all.
You can report things going wrong about the test patches and nothing more.
Your thoughts,if constructive,should be posted elsewhere.

MrPDR

18th October 2009, 09:49

No prob

The Very End

18th October 2009, 09:58

No prob

:doh:

Man, don't be like that, for the sake of this topic.
If you ain't got anything worth mention, do not mention it at all.

senn

18th October 2009, 10:03

danthebangerboy

18th October 2009, 10:19

If we don't get these, as you call them "pointless" patches, you end up with NFS:Shift for PC. Sure it looks pretty but the physics are busted to hell...

These small updates are so that when a big update DOES come around, all the foundations for it are strong, and LFS can continue to be the high quality production it always has been.

/end rant.

:iagree:

Thats the whole point of test patches, to test them, and if there are bugs then there will be more test patches to overcome these bugs, plus i would guess that the coding in the test patches we are recieving now have many adjustments (as opposed to original patch Z) which we can't see yet that are needed in order to incorporate things like the new tyre model into LFS.

You can't re-write major components of the sim such as a tyre model or maybe even the damage system and drop it into the existing game without adjusting anything else and expect it to work, coz it just won't.

pako_customize

18th October 2009, 10:35

next patch please :thumb:

CSU1

18th October 2009, 10:38

next patch please :thumb:

LOL!

:really:

gigi91430ita

18th October 2009, 10:40

What about adding an odometer in all road cars, like in RAC?

Then I noticed that ABS and TCS don't work below a certain speed (in TCS you can adjust that speed), while in real cars usually these systems can work even at really low speeds (4-5 Km/h). Cold you adjust these values for both systems?

Ripley

18th October 2009, 10:44

This a feedback thread. Keep up with the pace and read each post.
Yes, read each post, even that one where Scawen himself said NOT to make him waste time with useless posts like yours.

MrPDR

18th October 2009, 11:13

lol, jeez, I said no probs meaning I understand. Continue with the topic

pearcy_2k7

19th October 2009, 16:26

Time for a new patch :P

The Very End

19th October 2009, 16:29

Time for a new patch :P

When time is ready :nod:
But as we wait for the big one, it's good with all these little patches too. They might not look that much of a change if you look on them as soli additions, but overall they do make a change. It's all those little things that makes out the big one :)

pearcy_2k7

19th October 2009, 16:30

Not complaining, im happy with the progress made this past week. But theres been 0 real bug reports so just saying we should move on but i doubt what i say will make scawen release a new one :D Just felt like saying it.

The Very End

19th October 2009, 16:32

Nothing wrong with saying that, but I think the thing that slows them down now is the car/track additions, aka Eric :)
No offence to him, and it's a good amount of work to do, but I think that's where it slows down atm.

Takumi_lfs

21st October 2009, 21:10

Inouva is a man.

Btw, Thanks for the commands Degats

iFastLT

27th October 2009, 21:36

Ohh come on, enough of these nonsenses, better work on physics and other important things, we can live without these little improvements

Mango Juice

27th October 2009, 21:40

Ohh come on, enough of these nonsenses, better work on physics and other important thing, we can live without these little improvements

Agreed.

But this shows good signs that the new physics is near.

Takumi_lfs

27th October 2009, 21:48

Ohh come on, enough of these nonsenses, better work on physics and other important things, we can live without these little improvements

I think he is, but using this thread for small fixes/improvements and adding new features for testing on all other systems. Also finding bugs alot faster and easier.