mlracing
2nd December 2005, 14:32
i think the aero effect on the GTR cars is too weak, and there seem to be no bottom-tray effect.
evidence 1 - driving FZR on city towncourse
try the last corner (high speed, 140kph+), changing wings does little to the handling, but changing suspension has apparent effect on handling. :shrug:
evidence 2 - jacking up the front
in endurance oval race, some people jack up the front and apply zero wings in order to achieve stable and fast driving. as a matter of fact,they can achieve 290kph top speed. with realistic setup, u can't beat their time. imo with the jacked up front end, the car should fly.
evidence 3 - body height
10cm+ of ground clearance is usually better than 6cm of ground clearance, even on flat track. :pillepall
what do u think?
evidence 1 - driving FZR on city towncourse
try the last corner (high speed, 140kph+), changing wings does little to the handling, but changing suspension has apparent effect on handling. :shrug:
evidence 2 - jacking up the front
in endurance oval race, some people jack up the front and apply zero wings in order to achieve stable and fast driving. as a matter of fact,they can achieve 290kph top speed. with realistic setup, u can't beat their time. imo with the jacked up front end, the car should fly.
evidence 3 - body height
10cm+ of ground clearance is usually better than 6cm of ground clearance, even on flat track. :pillepall
what do u think?