View Full Version : Spec Needed To Play LFS
dmwright
27th August 2007, 22:29
Hi,
I simply have a Low spec Laptop just for browsing the internet, I was looking at the Required Computer Specification Needed to be able to run LFS. I looked at it and I was quite surprised. Can anyone explain to me a :
Needed
1 GHz Processor
128Mb Ram
3D Graphics Card
Mine
1.2Ghz Processor
256Mb Ram
3D Graphics Card
Not be able to cope with LFS even when it has a higher spec and freezes alot. This to me doesnt make sense is there any way i could get my laptop be able to cope with LFS and run it on a full server?
Many Thanks,
Matty :)
Jakg
27th August 2007, 22:33
Freezes? Do you mean freezes as in stops or low FPS? If the former then it's the HDD being raped (Laptops often have slow hard drives), if the former then tbh if everythings set to low then you've got to live with it.
Or overclock :P
dmwright
27th August 2007, 22:38
Low FPS i get.
dropin_biking
27th August 2007, 22:41
Might be overheating and slowing the chip down...
~Bryan~
dmwright
27th August 2007, 22:44
Im sure its not overheating due to its not very hot underneath, if you get me :)
Jakg
27th August 2007, 22:49
technically the heat of the heatsink has no correlation to the heat of the CPU, but while it's probably running a bit hot i think it's more the fact it's a bit slow thats the problem.
Maelstrom
27th August 2007, 22:57
Hi,
Not be able to cope with LFS even when it has a higher spec and freezes alot. This to me doesnt make sense is there any way i could get my laptop be able to cope with LFS and run it on a full server?
I have a 1.4 ghz Thunderbird and I can't even get near it! I avoid servers with more than 15 players cause turn one ends up with something like 5 - 7 fps and it doesn't really go over 20 fps after that.
BTW it depend what CPU? 1 ghz doesn't mean anything. If it is a Celeron then even with 500 mhz more you couldn't do anything with it. If it was a pentium M it would be another story!
The Moose
27th August 2007, 23:16
You have to bear in mind that minimum specs are just the specs you need to run the sim, with 1 car and low graphics.
Running it with a full grid is a whole different ball game. (and it simply isn't going to happen with your laptop)
Since patch X and it's huge grids LFS has become even more demanding.
Woz
27th August 2007, 23:18
Run in 16bit gfx and it will solve a lot of issues. Just make sure you enable dither as well.
If you lappy is older is might not have HW T&L which will be a major issue.
Becky Rose
27th August 2007, 23:36
Run in 16bit gfx and it will solve a lot of issues.
Not necessarily, most modern graphics cards are a lot faster under 32bit, which might sound strange but it's to do with Z-depth, 32bit optimisation in the firmware and design layout, and poor backward compatibility support. However most laptop graphics chips are indeed probably faster under 16bit.
ajp71
27th August 2007, 23:48
You have to bear in mind that minimum specs are just the specs you need to run the sim, with 1 car and low graphics.
Running it with a full grid is a whole different ball game. (and it simply isn't going to happen with your laptop)
TBH I think they're dated from S1 days and trying to run S2 offline with that is ambitious and online pointless. The specs should really be set so that you can play comfortably online. I'd say my PC was just at the minimum specs for decent gameplay, 2.8ghz P4, 2.5gb ram and 9600 Pro in reality I get 100fps offline and at least 30 most of the time online, which is about the level you absolutely have to have for a decent experience.
blackcarmafia
27th August 2007, 23:58
i have 512 RAm and my avrage is 50 FPS on more crowdet and 70-80 if i drive with litle opponennts
but on bump and jump it sometimes say .. too many physical objects .. maybe computer cant handle all fences? :shrug:
TyresHot
28th August 2007, 00:27
Hi,
I simply have a Low spec Laptop just for browsing the internet, I was looking at the Required Computer Specification Needed to be able to run LFS. I looked at it and I was quite surprised. Can anyone explain to me a :
Needed
1 GHz Processor
128Mb Ram
3D Graphics Card
Mine
1.2Ghz Processor
256Mb Ram
3D Graphics Card
Not be able to cope with LFS even when it has a higher spec and freezes alot. This to me doesnt make sense is there any way i could get my laptop be able to cope with LFS and run it on a full server?
Many Thanks,
Matty :)
download the latest patch of yourvideo card and remove unwanted programs:thumb:
ajp71
28th August 2007, 00:38
but on bump and jump it sometimes say .. too many physical objects .. maybe computer cant handle all fences? :shrug:
Yeah Bump and Jump is very CPU intensive, thankfully only getting about 25-30fps isn't too bad with that kind of racing only track that really causes me issues is Bunnyhop with all those tires it's just unplayable.
Woz
28th August 2007, 00:40
Not necessarily, most modern graphics cards are a lot faster under 32bit, which might sound strange but it's to do with Z-depth, 32bit optimisation in the firmware and design layout, and poor backward compatibility support. However most laptop graphics chips are indeed probably faster under 16bit.
While true in many cases I have found with the ATI mobile solutions I get far higher and more level frame rates in 16bit. But then I run my lappy at 2*AA and 8*AF at 1024*768 and still never fall below 40fps.
Lappy tech is such you are better to limit the work done to help with heat etc.
mrodgers
28th August 2007, 01:01
LFS
640x480x16 bit
2 AI cars with me dropped to spectate. Viewing inside the AI car that is behind. XFG at BLackwood. Solid 20 FPS.
Computer
Celeron 667 MHz with 256Mb SDRAM and old PCI (not express) Radeon 9250 256Mb graphics card. 5400 rpm hard drive as well (30 Gb I think)
Couldn't run online at all with that of course, but connected to my other computer as a LAN host, my daughter and I use to race together all the time. Connected to LAN, she would get 25-30 FPS on average, but dropping quite frequently while running on my LAN host.
I just wanted to post that. I have in the past also. But realistically, you can never go by the minimum specs. They are always the minimum that can barely run the software. Not a usable way to spec out a machine.
dmwright
28th August 2007, 11:21
Hmm... Well the make of the CPU is VIA C3. Ive tried running it on low graphics, smallest screen, No running programs which arnt needed and got around 10FPS. Maybe i should stick with my computer were i get over 100fps :).
Many thanks for the info,
Matt
Jakg
28th August 2007, 11:35
A VIA CPU at 1 GHz is in no way comparable to an P4 at 1 GHz - the VIA CPU's make very little heat, but aren't that quick
Stone in Focus
28th August 2007, 13:35
I used to play online with my P3 1ghz, no graphics card and only 256 ram. Never got better than 20 fps though and averaged about 12-15.
N0w i get about 50-60 or about 30-40 with a full grid online with 1.8ghz dore2duo, 1gb ram and no graphics card (its in the mail!)
rjm1982
28th August 2007, 15:17
Keep in mind, laptops are slower in general.
Not only are the mobile graphics cards lower speed, the bus speeds between the expansion cards and MB are generally alot slower, and most laptops have shared video memory (using the system ram, rather than their own) which is very slow...
If you can play at all, enjoy it... I play on my laptop sometimes, and get around 50fps on average, but my laptop was bought specifically for gaming with those considerations in mind...
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.