PDA

View Full Version : 16:10 Format - 1680*1050


pb32000
21st September 2005, 20:55
I'm considering getting a Dell widescreen monitor and I've read that somebody ran LFS at 1680*1050 (the native res of the said monitor). I can't see it in my LFS screen modes section with 'show non-square modes' enabled. At the moment I use 1280*1024 with a 17" tft which of course has a max res of 1280*1024, is this why no bigger modes are showing?

So basically I would like to know is the option for bigger resolutions (specifiaclly 1680*1050) available when you have a monitor that can support them?

oper@tor
21st September 2005, 21:04
lfs automatically shows all avaivable resolutions (enable the option over the box). i have a dell-laptop and play lfs with 1440x900 (16:10) too :)

pb32000
21st September 2005, 21:16
Great, thanks!

fanatic
21st September 2005, 21:26
yeah, I also play on Dell laptop, but LFS runs too slow in the maximum resolution so I had to tweak the inf file of the nvidia driver.
I've replaced 1024x768 with 1024x640, then in LFS have selected "show non-standard videomodes", and I got my 16:10 in the low resolution.

shoman24v
21st September 2005, 22:09
I play LFS at 1920x1200 on my Inspiron XPS gen 2 laptop

Runs like a dream

heres a screen

avih
22nd September 2005, 06:57
I'm with a friend's dell laptop, display is 1680x1050 and it displays well. (not very good framerate though at this res with the mobile 5200fx 32M). but it works

MartyT
22nd September 2005, 16:33
I use a non-standard resolution with my Sony Wega 42". 1184x684 because the oversan takes a 1/2" off all the way around. LFS is great at using any reolution you can set your video card at. You should have no problem.

pb32000
22nd September 2005, 16:40
Mmm sounds good. I just don't know if I can justify spending that much just to play games bigger and watch tv on a nice screen. Hmm, I'll have to think about it more. But anyway, good to know about the different res options.

oper@tor
22nd September 2005, 17:10
...I just don't know if I can justify spending that much just to play games bigger and watch tv on a nice screen....
but that is what the screen is made for:woohoo:

Scope
29th September 2005, 10:13
I'm considering getting a Dell widescreen monitor and I've read that somebody ran LFS at 1680*1050 (the native res of the said monitor). I can't see it in my LFS screen modes section with 'show non-square modes' enabled. At the moment I use 1280*1024 with a 17" tft which of course has a max res of 1280*1024, is this why no bigger modes are showing?

So basically I would like to know is the option for bigger resolutions (specifiaclly 1680*1050) available when you have a monitor that can support them?

What Dell are you thinking about? The 20" i've been looking at goes to 1600x1200 and it is 16:10 too - but I guess it will get non-square pixels. What model is it? the model i look at is: Dell Ultrasharp 2001FP 20" performance LCD Flat Panel Monitor:

http://dellware.euro.dell.com/dellstore/dellware/config/default.asp?s=dkpad&l=DA&m=dkk&n=&cu=dkpad&v=d&cc=&ogn=&kcd=&ad=&mc=&rs=&cuid=&cg=&pch=1&demo=&gc=&sbc=none&co=&b=DDK_200-23359

ORION
29th September 2005, 11:37
I have read that some Dell TFT screen (24' iirc) was very bright, actually so bright that you have to set the gamma to 0.2 in order to get a good looking picture...

If I had the money, I would get a BenQ 23':
http://www.prad.de/guide/screen1211.html

Im sorry it's in German, but you can search your own data sheets with the name:
BenQ FP231W :)

inCogNito
29th September 2005, 11:51
What Dell are you thinking about? The 20" i've been looking at goes to 1600x1200 and it is 16:10 too - but I guess it will get non-square pixels. What model is it? the model i look at is: Dell Ultrasharp 2001FP 20" performance LCD Flat Panel Monitor:

http://dellware.euro.dell.com/dellstore/dellware/config/default.asp?s=dkpad&l=DA&m=dkk&n=&cu=dkpad&v=d&cc=&ogn=&kcd=&ad=&mc=&rs=&cuid=&cg=&pch=1&demo=&gc=&sbc=none&co=&b=DDK_200-23359

What makes you think it's 16:10?

OPK
29th September 2005, 12:04
1600x1200 ... is more like 16:12, heh :)

ColeusRattus
29th September 2005, 12:16
Perhaps, it might even be 4:3... wow :D

OPK
29th September 2005, 12:31
maybe, yes :P

pb32000
29th September 2005, 12:35
What Dell are you thinking about? The 20" i've been looking at goes to 1600x1200 and it is 16:10 too - but I guess it will get non-square pixels. What model is it? the model i look at is: Dell Ultrasharp 2001FP 20" performance LCD Flat Panel Monitor:

http://dellware.euro.dell.com/dellstore/dellware/config/default.asp?s=dkpad&l=DA&m=dkk&n=&cu=dkpad&v=d&cc=&ogn=&kcd=&ad=&mc=&rs=&cuid=&cg=&pch=1&demo=&gc=&sbc=none&co=&b=DDK_200-23359

Thats the 4:3 format one as people have said. I was looking at the 2005FPW which is 20" widescreen. Then there's the 2405FPW as Orion said which is 24" @ 1900*1200, but thats like £700 here.

inCogNito
30th September 2005, 08:10
Perhaps, it might even be 4:3... wow :D

16:10 is some kind of stange marketing anyway.

why don't they call it 8:5? i guess 16:10 sounds bigger...

"hey, i got my new 16:9 flatscreen"
"bah, lamer, i got a 16:10!"

:D

maybe 4:3 needs to be upgraded to 16:12? :shrug:

Vain
30th September 2005, 09:21
You're all noobs, my monitor is 49380 : 37035!!!

Vain

pb32000
30th September 2005, 10:25
16:10 is some kind of stange marketing anyway.

why don't they call it 8:5? i guess 16:10 sounds bigger...

"hey, i got my new 16:9 flatscreen"
"bah, lamer, i got a 16:10!"

:D

maybe 4:3 needs to be upgraded to 16:12? :shrug:

I guess its 16:10 so its comparable to 16:9. Widescreen is a bit of a marketing ploy altogether, you get more real estate with the 20" 4:3 screen, but people like widescreen and its fairly widely used these days so people will continue to buy it.